Role of Bedside Leukoreduction Filters in Mitigating Febrile Non-Hemolytic Transfusion Reactions in Thalassaemia Major Patients

Authors

  • Sundas Ali Pathology Department, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, (P.I.M.S), Islamabad
  • Maha Tariq Kiani Department of Pathology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad
  • Amna Imtiaz Department of Pathology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad
  • Farwa Sijjeel Blood Bank, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad
  • Tazeen Anwar Thalassemia Centre, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad
  • Farah Hanif Department of Pathology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48036/apims.v21i3.1153

Keywords:

Beta Thalassemia Major, Febrile Non-hemolytic Transfusion Reaction, Leukoreduction, Leukoreduction filters, Bedside Leukoreduction Filters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of bedside leukoreduction filters in reducing the occurrence of febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs) among patients with beta-thalassemia major, by comparing their frequency in patients receiving blood through a filter versus those without a filter.

Methodology: A retrospective cross-sectional comparative study was conducted at the Thalassemia Centre in collaboration with the Blood Bank, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, from January to March 2024. A total of 1,000 multi-transfused beta-thalassemia major patients with a history of FNHTRs were included and divided into two groups: 500 patients received blood through bedside leukoreduction filters, while 500 received non-filtered blood. Transfused red cell concentrates ranged in storage age from 2 to 14 days. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 20, and the chi-square test was applied to compare the incidence of FNHTRs between the two groups. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Among the 500 patients receiving bedside leukoreduced blood, 7 (1.4%) experienced FNHTRs during transfusion, presenting with symptoms such as fever, chills, cold extremities, abdominal pain, and facial flushing. In contrast, 49 (9.8%) patients receiving non-filtered blood developed FNHTRs (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The incidence of FNHTRs was significantly reduced with the use of bedside leukoreduction filters compared to non-leukoreduced blood. Implementing this simple and cost-effective strategy in resource-limited settings can help prevent transfusion reactions, improve patient and staff satisfaction, and reduce the risk of transfusion discontinuation, prolonged hospitalization, and extensive laboratory investigations.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles